No story is ever complete. We are always updating our views based on the evidence. I tend not to comment on others views but in my experience they tend to underestimate the value accrued over long periods. Eg Study shows no benefit at 5 years. But yet we are treating for 20-30 yr time horizons were the benefits are much greater. It’s a very contentious area.
Well done, sir. Many useful nuggets of wisdom in one place. Absolutely super article, thank you!
Glad you found it of use.
No story is ever complete. We are always updating our views based on the evidence. I tend not to comment on others views but in my experience they tend to underestimate the value accrued over long periods. Eg Study shows no benefit at 5 years. But yet we are treating for 20-30 yr time horizons were the benefits are much greater. It’s a very contentious area.
Do you think the Cholesterol story is fully complete. There seems to be a wide divergence of opinion on this (Malcom Kendrick, Shapiro etc).
Curious on your take?